Cancer has long been one of the most challenging diseases in human history, affecting people across time, geographies, and backgrounds. While it once left us with few options, advances in science and medicine are opening new paths for treatment and hope. Today, the 5-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined has climbed from just 49% in the mid-1970s to 69% for diagnoses made between 2013 and 2019.1 Not surprisingly, the United States is now home to more than 18 million cancer survivors, with more than 70% living beyond 5 years after diagnosis.2 This transformation in cancer outlooks began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries with the arrival of anesthesia, antiseptics, and radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy, particularly following the discovery of X-rays in 1895 and radium shortly after, was the first modern medical innovation to offer a real chance at fighting back; but early low-energy machines could only sometimes shrink or, occasionally, eliminate localized tumors, at the cost of severe side effects.3 Today, modern 4D, image-guided systems can deliver highly modulated and targeted radiation treatments that are particularly effective for small tumors. Chemotherapy, which was first developed in the 1940s, has also been refined over the past decades. Today, it plays a critical role in the treatment of many aggressive cancers, and in some cases, such as testicular cancer or certain leukemias, it can even lead to a cure. The limitations of traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy spurred further innovation, leading to the development of targeted agents such as EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer, HER2 therapies in breast cancer, and modern immunotherapy.4 The field is also seeing a shift towards more personalized and precision medicine, using genomic profiling and genetic testing for the DPYD gene to minimize harm while maximizing treatment outcomes.
Why Chemotherapy Remains Foundational
Chemotherapy remains a mainstay of cancer treatment, widely used by oncologists to treat aggressive or metastasized cancers. When the idea of using toxic chemicals to destroy cancerous cells was first explored in the 1940s, treatments were limited to the compound ‘nitrogen mustard’, which was originally developed as a chemical weapon.5 This was soon followed by experiments with related alkylating compounds such as chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide. Although early chemotherapeutics could sometimes cause striking tumor shrinkage, remissions were often short-lived, and there was widespread skepticism about whether cancer could ever be truly cured with drugs through the 1950s.
This began to change with breakthroughs in the following decades, as studies with chemotherapy regiments such as VAMP (Vincristine, Amethopterin [methotrexate], Mercaptopurine, and Prednisone) in childhood leukemia, and MOPP (Mechlorethamine, Oncovin [vincristine], Procarbazine, and Prednisone) in Hodgkin’s disease, demonstrated for the first time that drugs could cure advanced malignancies. Complete remission rates were seen to rise dramatically from about zero to 80%.6 Today, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone treatment for many solid tumors, when integrated with surgery or radiation, as a curative and palliative therapy for a variety of cancers. Advances in supportive care, including the use of growth factors, antiemetics and antimicrobial prophylaxis, has improved tolerability and permitted dose intensification, reinforcing chemotherapy’s foundational role despite the advent of targeted agents and immunotherapies.
Immunotherapy’s Game-Changing Impact
Although immunotherapy dates back to the 1890s when Coley’s toxin revealed that the immune system could fight cancer, it wasn’t until the 1950s and 1960s that the field saw real evidence of efficacy.7 Cytokine treatments such as interferon-α for hairy cell leukemia and high-dose interleukin-2 for metastatic melanoma and kidney cancer induced durable responses, even though complete remission was uncommon. The true turning point came with monoclonal antibodies in the 1970s and the 1997 approval of rituximab for CD20-positive lymphomas, ushering in a new era for targeted immunotherapy.
The 1990s also saw the discovery of immune checkpoints like CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, leading to the development of drugs like ipilimumab and pembrolizumab, which now deliver long-term responses in 23–34% of patients with some types of melanomas, lung, bladder and other cancers.8 In the 2010s, there were still more advances in immunotherapy with adoptive cell transfer therapies, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, allowing for greater innovation and success in targeting and eliminating cancer cells.
While transformative, immunotherapy does present limitations, such as the development of resistance, variable patient response, immune-related side effects, and substantial financial burden.9 Making immunotherapy more effective and widely accessible will require a better understanding of why some tumors respond while others don’t, particularly the role of tumor immunogenicity and the suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME).
Targeted Therapies & Precision Medicine
The broad toxicity limitations of non-specific chemotherapy spurred the development of drugs that can precisely target features that are unique to cancer cells. This type of treatment may be used to attack cancer cells directly or to support other treatments like chemotherapy. The prototype ‘imatinib’, which was approved for chronic myelogenous leukemia in 2001, works by binding the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase and shutting down the enzyme that causes unchecked cell division.10 This approach transformed the outlook for a once-fatal disease into one with near-normal life expectancy.
Today’s targeted therapies include monoclonal antibodies like trastuzumab and bevacizumab, which latch onto cell-surface receptors or growth factors to interrupt the signals that incite cancer cells to grow and form new blood vessels.11 Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib for EGFR-mutant lung cancer or lapatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer can enter cells to block overactive enzymes. More recent advances include antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) that combine a targeting antibody with a potent chemotherapy payload.12 By matching tumor-specific molecular profiles with targeted therapies, precision medicine aims to achieve deeper remissions with fewer off-target effects.
The Hybrid Future of Oncology: Why Breakthroughs and Foundations Must Move Forward Together
In cancer care today, it’s tempting to speak in absolutes: that immunotherapy is replacing chemotherapy, that targeted therapies are rendering conventional approaches obsolete, that what’s next will finally fix what’s broken. But real progress in oncology rarely comes in absolutes; it comes in combinations, in context, and in continuation. As discussed in one of our recent blog articles, approximately 90 oral chemotherapy agents have been approved by the FDA over the past 20 years, with over 900 chemotherapy agents currently in development.13 In this landscape, our oral chemotherapy candidate, GEMCEDA™, stands out as a first-in-class oral gemcitabine that achieves unprecedented IV-comparable bioavailability and presents new ways to fight and better ways to live for people with advanced cancers.
At Helix BioPharma, we are developing therapies that reflect the hybrid reality of modern oncology. Our pipeline spans both legacy and emerging treatment modalities: L-DOS47, a tumor microenvironment modifier designed to enhance the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors; GEMCEDA, an oral chemotherapy that modernizes a longstanding treatment backbone; LEUMUNA, an immune checkpoint modulator under evaluation for hematological malignancies; and a pipeline of CEACAM6-targeting antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and radionuclide–drug conjugates (RDCs) engineered to deliver potent cytotoxic or radiotherapeutic payloads with precision. Together, these programs exemplify our strategy of integrating new and established mechanisms to address cancer’s complexity from multiple angles. The most effective cancer treatments are already being shaped not by what replaces what, but by how we strategically combine the strengths of each. At Helix BioPharma, we’re not just prepared for this reality; we operate as a part of it.
References
1 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21820
2 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11542986/
3 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9720583/
4 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6243123/
5 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10310991/
6 https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/68/21/8643/541799/A-History-of-Cancer-Chemotherapy
7 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11717579/
8 https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(24)03910-3/fulltext
9 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9708058/
10 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2014/357027
11 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037059/
12 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211383523002320